Employee safety act india

india-map

Home
MPs & MLAs
Legislatures
Parliament
State
Bills & Acts
Budgets
Policy
LAMP
Careers

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019

Labour and Employment Introduced Jul 23, 2019 Standing Committee Report Feb 11, 2020 Sep 19, 2020

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis

PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL

Context

In India, labour falls under the Concurrent List of the Constitution. Therefore, both Parliament and state legislatures can make laws regulating labour. Currently, there are over 100 state and 40 central laws regulating various aspects of labour such as resolution of industrial disputes, working conditions, social security and wages.[1] The Second National Commission on Labour (2002) found existing legislation to be complex, with archaic provisions and inconsistent definitions. To improve ease of compliance and ensure uniformity in labour laws, the National Commission recommended that existing labour laws should be consolidated into broader groups such as (i) industrial relations, (ii) wages, (iii) social security, (iv) safety, and (v) welfare and working conditions.[2]

With regard to health, safety and working conditions, the Commission noted that there are several laws governing health and safety of workers. It recommended the consolidation of these laws into two codes; one universally applicable law to ensure safety at the workplace, and another law containing minimum standards of working conditions, work hours and leaves. It recommended that sector-specific requirements (e.g. for factories or mines) may be incorporated in regulations or manuals. 2

In this context, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019 was introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Labour and Employment, Mr. Santosh Kumar Gangwar, on July 23, 2019. Following this, it was referred to the Standing Committee on Labour and Employment, on October 9, 2019. The Code seeks to regulate health and safety conditions of workers in establishments with 10 or more workers, and in all mines and docks. It subsumes and replaces 13 existing labour laws relating to safety, health and working conditions.

Key Features

The Code consolidates 13 Acts regulating health safety and working conditions. These laws cover factories, mines, dock workers, building and construction workers, plantation labour, contract labour, inter-state migrant workers, working journalists, motor transport workers, sales promotion employees, and cine workers. The Annexure to this Brief compares the key provisions of the Code with the provisions of these Acts.

Coverage, license and registration

Rights and duties of employees and employers

Work hours and leave

Working conditions and welfare facilities

Relevant Authorities

Offences and Penalties

PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Rationale for some special provisions unclear

The Code replaces 13 laws regulating health, safety and working conditions of workers. The National Commission on Labour, 2002 recommended consolidation and simplification of these laws. 2 Further, the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Code states that it seeks to simplify and amalgamate the provisions of the 13 Acts.[3] While the Code consolidates existing Acts, it falls short of simplifying their provisions. We illustrate this below.

The Code contains general provisions which apply to all establishments. These include provisions on registration, filing of returns, and duties of employers. However, it also includes additional provisions that apply to specific type of workers such as those in factories and mines, or as audio-visual workers, journalists, sales promotion employees, contract labour and construction workers.

It may be argued that special provisions on health and safety are required for certain categories of hazard-prone establishments such as factories and mines. It may be necessary to allow only licensed establishments to operate factories and mines. Similarly, special provisions may be required for specific categories of vulnerable workers such as contract labour and migrant workers. However, the rationale for mandating special provisions for other workers is not clear.

For example, the Code requires that any person suffering from deafness or giddiness may not be employed in construction activity which involve a risk of accident. The question is why such a general safety requirement is not provided for all workers. Similarly, the Code provides for registration of employment contracts for audio-visual workers, raising the question of why there is a special treatment for this category.

Further, the Code specifies additional leave for sales promotion employees. It also specifies that working journalists cannot be made to work more than 144 hours in four weeks (i.e. an average of 36 hours per week). For all other workers covered under the Code, the minimum leave and maximum work hours is prescribed through rules. The rationale for differential treatment with regard to working conditions between working journalists and sales promotion employees on the one hand, and all other workers on the other hand, is unclear.

Note that, if any sector-specific provisions are needed, the Code empowers the government to notify them.

Table 1 below sets out the general provisions in the Code applicable to all workers and the additional special provisions applicable to specific categories of workers and establishments under the Code.

Table 1: Comparison of the general provisions and special provisions in the Code

Feature

General Provisions

Specific provisions

Duties of Employers

Working conditions and welfare facilities

Dangerous operations

Inspector

License and Registration

Work hours

Leave

Disability

Age

Sources: Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019; PRS.

Certain workers not covered under the Code

The Code covers establishments with 10 or more workers. It excludes establishments with less than 10 workers. This raises the question of whether workers in smaller establishments should be covered by health and safety laws.

It has been argued that application of labour laws based on the number of employees is desirable to reduce the compliance burden on infant industries and to promote their economic growth.[4] ,[5] To promote the growth of smaller establishments, some states have amended their labour laws to increase the threshold of their application. For instance, Rajasthan has increased the threshold of applicability of the Factories Act, 1948, from 10 workers to 20 workers (if power is used), and from 20 workers to 40 workers (if power is not used). Note that a similar amendment was proposed in the Factories (Amendment) Bill, 2014, which lapsed with the dissolution of the 16 th Lok Sabha.

On the other hand, it has also been argued that such low numeric thresholds may create adverse incentives for establishments sizes to remain small, in order to avoid complying with labour regulation. 4 , 5 Also, some have argued that a law on health and safety should cover workers in all establishments, to protect their basic rights against unsafe work practices. 2 , 4 In this regard, the NCL had recommended three laws - one which contained broad health and safety regulations applicable to all establishments, and two other laws on working conditions and welfare facilities: one for larger establishments (hiring 20 or more workers) and the other for smaller establishments (hiring less than 20 workers). In the third law, it prescribed less stringent provisions for conditions such as welfare facilities in order to reduce the compliance burden on smaller establishments.

Note that most countries do not exempt smaller enterprises from labour regulation entirely. The International Labour Organisation (2005) notes that only 10% of its member states had exempted micro and small enterprises from labour regulation altogether.[6] Most countries adopt a mixed approach to labour regulation. For instance, health and safety laws in the United States, United Kingdom, South Africa and Philippines provide universal coverage to all workers (except for domestic help in the US and UK). 7 However, certain obligations under these laws are only applicable to enterprises with employees over a certain threshold. For example, record-keeping obligations for work-related accidents in the US only apply to establishments with at least 10 employees. In South Africa, only enterprises with 20 or more workers are required to designate a health and safety representative. [7]

Civil Court barred from hearing matters under the Code

The Code bars civil courts from hearing any matters under the Code. In some matters where persons are aggrieved by the orders of authorities such as, by the order of the Inspector-cum-facilitator in the case of factories, or by the revocation of a license for contractors, the Code provides for an administrative appellate authority to be notified. However, it does not provide a judicial mechanism for hearing disputes under the Code.

Under the existing 13 health and safety laws, claims which affect the rights of workers such as wages, work hours, and leave, are heard by labour courts and industrial tribunals. However, the Code bars the jurisdiction of civil courts, and does not specify that such disputes arising under it may be heard by these labour courts and tribunals.

Further, there may be other health and safety-related disputes. For example, an employer may wish to challenge an order passed by an Inspector which identified certain safety violations at the workplace. In such a case, the employer may file a case in the civil court for seeking remedy against the orders passed by the Inspector. Appeal may be filed before the High Court and ultimately before the Supreme Court. However, the Code bars civil courts from hearing any dispute under the Code. As a result, employers who are aggrieved by the orders of the Inspector and by the notified administrative appellate authority will not be able to challenge it in a civil court. The only recourse available to them would be to directly file a writ petition before the relevant High Court. It can be argued that the bar on civil courts from hearing matters under the Code may deny aggrieved persons an opportunity to challenge certain issues before a lower court.

Wages not defined in the Code

The Code refers to “wages” in provisions relating to overtime work and calculation of leave. However, it does not define the term. Different laws contain varying definitions of the term ‘wages’. For instance, the Code on Wages, 2019 defines ‘wages’ to include basic pay, dearness allowance and retaining allowance, whereas the definition of wages in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 does not include retaining allowance. It is unclear as to which definition of ‘wages’ will apply to the Code. This may lead to uncertainty in the interpretation of the term for the purpose of calculating overtime wages and earned leave.

Several matters left for notification by the government

The Code makes provisions for various welfare facilities, health and safety standards, and work hours for workers. However, it does not specify the standards but empowers the appropriate government to notify them. The Acts which are being subsumed by the Code specify these standards. For example, the Acts governing factories, mines, and beedi workers, specify maximum work hours of 9 hours per day and 48 hours per week. Similarly, some of these laws make provisions for drinking water, washrooms, and first aid facilities. The question is whether minimum requirements should be specified in the Code itself on matters such as work hours, safety standards, and working conditions (e.g. washrooms and drinking water).

Note that one of the provisions of the Code overlaps with the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (which is not being subsumed by the Code). The Code states that the central government may make rules to provide for crèches in establishments with more than 50 workers, i.e. it is not mandatory. The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 makes the provision of crèches mandatory in such establishments.

Annexure: Comparison of the Code with the laws being subsumed

Table 2 below compares the key provisions of the Code with the provisions of the 13 Acts it proposes to subsume. The 13 Acts are: Factories Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952; Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Act, 1986; Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996; Plantations Labour Act, 1951; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979; Working Journalist and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provision) Act, 1955; Working Journalist (Fixation of Rates of Wages) Act, 1958; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Sales Promotion Employees (Condition of Service) Act, 1976; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966; and Cine Workers and Cinema Theatre Workers Act, 1981.

Table 2: Comparison of existing laws with the Code

Features

Existing Laws

2019 Code

Coverage and registration

Authorities

Duties

Work hours and leave

Health and welfare facilities

Special provisions

Offences and Penalties

Sources: Respective 13 Acts; 2019 Code; PRS.

[1]. “Suggested Labour Policy Reforms”, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry, 2014.

[3]. Statement of Objects and Reasons, The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019.

[4]. “Towards an optimal regulatory framework in India”, Implementation Group, Planning Commission, 12 th Five Year Plan.

[7]. LEGOSH, Occupational Safety and Health, Country Profiles, International Labour Organisation.

DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.

Relevant Links

PRS Products

Original Text